
Oily fish provide joint-supporting omega-3 fatty acids for dogs, but their quality can vary. Discover the concerns surrounding overfishing, contaminants and declining EPA and DHA levels, as well as safer alternatives.
Published in
Natural IngredientsOsteoarthritis can severely affect dogs’ mobility. Omega-3 fatty acids, particularly EPA and DHA, are among the most recognised nutritional solutions for supporting joint function and modulating inflammation.
These fatty acids are naturally present in fatty fish (sardine, salmon, anchovy).
However, these sources face major concerns: declining nutritional content, the risk of contaminant bioaccumulation, and ecological pressure.
At Laboratoire Sensilia, our commitment is to provide effective, pure omega-3 fatty acids for your dog while minimising environmental impact.
This article reveals the current challenges associated with fish-derived sources, drawing on scientific studies, to help you choose an omega-3 supplement that is truly safe and effective.
For decades, fatty fish have played a central role as a source of omega-3 fatty acids with recognised health benefits. There is a simple reason for this: they are among the few dietary sources naturally rich in EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid) and DHA (docosahexaenoic acid), the two marine fatty acids considered most beneficial for the body.
Contrary to what one might imagine, fish do not synthesise these omega-3 fatty acids themselves. They accumulate them by feeding on marine microalgae, plankton or organisms that consume them. This gives fish a particularly valuable lipid profile, with readily absorbed omega-3 fatty acids in proportions that are difficult to find in terrestrial foods.
Historically, several factors reinforced this status as a "reference":
Before alternative sources such as microalgae became available, fatty fish represented the simplest, most direct and most natural way to obtain the omega-3 fatty acids the body needs.
Not all species are equal when it comes to providing marine omega-3 fatty acids.
So-called "fatty" fish have higher EPA and DHA levels for a simple reason: they store more lipids in their tissues, and these lipids come mainly from their diet of microalgae, zooplankton and small crustaceans naturally rich in omega-3 fatty acids.
Unlike lean fish (such as cod or sole), which mainly use their muscle reserves for energy, fatty fish accumulate fat in their tissues, skin, and abdominal cavity. This fat serves as an energy reserve for long migrations, cold waters, or periods when food is less abundant.
Among these fatty fish, there is a wide variety of species:
| Species | EPA (g) | DHA (g) | EPA + DHA (g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mackerel | 0,9 - 1,0 | 1,0 - 1,6 | 1,9 - 2,5 |
| Herring | 0,7 - 1,0 | 0,7 - 0,9 | 1,6 - 1,7 |
| Salmon | 0,4 - 0,8 | 0,6 - 1,2 | 1,0 - 1,8 |
| Anchovies / Sardines | 0,4 - 0,5 | 0,6 - 0 | 1,0 - 1,4 |
| Trout | 0,4 - 1,2 | 0,4 - 1,8 | 0,5 - 3,0 |
| Tuna | 0,3 - 0,4 | 1,0 - 1,2 | 1,3 - 1,6 |
Numerous studies of fish oils rich in EPA and DHA show a consistent pattern of results: modulation of inflammation, a moderate but genuine improvement in joint comfort and several beneficial effects on metabolic and cardiovascular profiles.
Several controlled trials have evaluated EPA/DHA-enriched foods in arthritic dogs:
These studies show progressive benefits, generally visible after 6 to 12 weeks of supplementation.
At the cellular level, Curtis et al. demonstrated that EPA and DHA reduce the production of inflammatory mediators (PGE2, NO, MMP) in arthritic canine chondrocytes, confirming a direct mechanism of action on joint tissues.
Studies also show positive systemic effects:
These results suggest a decrease in low-grade inflammation and better cellular protection.
While fish oil has long been considered the most accessible source of EPA and DHA, several major drawbacks are now well documented. They concern nutritional quality as much as sustainability and safety.
Small fatty fish such as anchovy, sardine, herring and mackerel are central to the global production of fish oil and fish meal. They also form the base of the marine food chain.
Bach et al. show that fish oil production increasingly relies on stocks that are fully exploited or overexploited, and that "ecosystem scarcity" increases as fishing for these forage fish intensifies.
This study highlights two major risks:
For their part, FAO reports (2020–2022) show that more than one third of global stocks are overexploited, compared to only 10% in the 1970s, confirming a structural trend.
Because they are naturally rich in lipids, fatty fish also tend to accumulate more environmental contaminants. Several recent studies show that this accumulation concerns heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants, and microplastics alike.
The study by Nøstbakken et al. shows that fatty fish, particularly salmon, mackerel, and herring, can contain measurable levels of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs, compounds that accumulate in adipose tissue over time. Even though observed concentrations generally remain within regulatory limits, they are systematically higher in fatty species than in lean fish, confirming accumulation directly linked to lipid content.
An analysis of the Italian market conducted by Nevigato et al. revealed that certain fish oil supplements show variable levels of oxidation and contaminants, suggesting that quality is not uniform among products available on the market and that purification does not always completely eliminate all undesirable traces.
These data complement the opinions of the European authority (EFSA), which reminds us that fish is the primary dietary source of methylmercury and that lipophilic contaminants persist durably in marine ecosystems.
Overall, studies show that despite their nutritional value, fatty fish can contain a range of contaminants whose levels depend on the species, age and catch area. This is an important factor when evaluating different omega-3 sources.
Several recent studies highlight a concerning trend: the decrease in the natural EPA and DHA content of wild fish, particularly in regions where fishing pressure is strongest.
When stocks of small pelagic fish are overexploited, they no longer have time to recover or rebuild their omega-3 reserves. This phenomenon is intensified by a second factor: the reduction in the primary production of omega-3 fatty acids by microalgae, a direct consequence of water warming.
Between 2000 and 2023, in the Mediterranean Sea, annual EPA + DHA catches fell from approximately 15 tonnes to 6 tonnes, a drop of nearly 60%.
Farmed fish are not spared. They are traditionally fed with fish meal and fish oil, themselves derived from wild stocks, which perpetuates fishing pressure.
To reduce this dependence, some aquaculture farms now replace these ingredients with soy or other plant sources that contain no EPA or DHA, which consequently reduces the omega-3 concentration in farmed fish.
As a result, on some farms, salmon EPA + DHA levels have decreased by approximately 50% over roughly a decade (Sprague et al.).
In response to the growing limitations of fatty fish and the oils derived from them, several omega-3 sources are emerging as safer, more stable and significantly more sustainable options. Two stand out in particular: microalgae oil and green-lipped mussel oil.
Marine microalgae are the organisms that naturally produce EPA and DHA. Fish are merely their "accumulators." By going directly to the source, microalgae oil offers several major advantages:
It is now a preferred source of EPA and DHA for many laboratories committed to animal and human health.
Discover our article on the benefits of algae oil
The New Zealand green-lipped mussel (Perna canaliculus) has a distinctive lipid profile containing:
It also comes from a more tightly regulated supply chain, with harvests strictly controlled by the New Zealand government, which limits pressure on wild stocks.
Discover our article: Green-lipped mussel, remedy for osteoarthritis
Because they simultaneously address the three challenges posed by fish oil:
They provide dogs with effective omega-3 fatty acids while avoiding the drawbacks associated with variability, oxidation and the uncertain sustainability of fatty fish.
Fatty fish have long been the benchmark for providing EPA and DHA, two omega-3 fatty acids that are essential for joint support. Studies show that they can improve mobility and reduce inflammation in arthritic dogs when provided in sufficient quantity.
However, current knowledge also highlights their limitations: significant variability in omega-3 content, contaminant accumulation and a gradual decline in EPA and DHA levels linked to overfishing and climate change. These factors make fish oil less reliable and less sustainable today.
That is why more stable and cleaner alternatives are emerging, such as microalgae oil and green-lipped mussel oil, which can provide highly bioavailable omega-3 fatty acids from sustainable supply chains, with no marine contaminants.
At Laboratoire Sensilia, this shift guides our work: offering omega-3 sources that are both effective and responsible. PERNIXOL®, formulated with green-lipped mussel oil extracted using supercritical CO₂ and microalgae oil, reflects this approach by providing a concentrated, pure source of EPA and DHA while respecting the oceans.
This provides a way to support dogs’ mobility with omega-3 fatty acids suited to today’s scientific and ecological challenges.
Discover PERNIXOL®
This article was written by the R&D team at Laboratoire Sensilia, experts in animal nutrition.
Sensilia Laboratory is a French, family-owned and independent laboratory based in Gironde, France. Since 2019, we have been researching and manufacturing healthy, innovative wellness products.